When Did Feminists Get Super-into Erasing Women?
Updated: Jan 30
When Did Feminists Get Super-into Erasing Women?Women (aka. "persons born with vaginas", "birthing persons", "menstruating people", etc., according to a variety of women's experts), in my opinion, are not the focus for feminist ideology. They are more of a placeholder for the real goal of feminism - Wave the Flag obedience (WTF obedience). This is playing out right now in women's sports across the world. Women are having to compete in sports against men, and it is turning into a process that is erasing women in sports now, and it will also erase the history of women IN sports. We know that current wins and medals for women are being handed over to male athletes, but women's results in the record books are also being overwritten at all levels - high school, college, club sports, the Olympics. These records will be wiped away by males competing as women, sanctioned and allowed by many women's organizations. This is what Title 9 and other efforts were meant to protect. The biology is inarguable. But, feminists believe that if you call these people transgender instead of male, the whole thing gets kicked aside. Yay for feminist ideology.
Feminism began as a movement to give women the power to make choices in their lives based on their beliefs and their values, but all it did was create a new list of rules to follow - For example, you can never become a woman who chooses time with her kids instead of time at work; and if you have the choice for an abortion, get an abortion; and white Christian men need to be hung by their heels and battered with a whip, etc. OK, this is my own interpretation of their rules, but it feels pretty close to truth for a lot of women.
So now that we have a new era of women's choices being blocked again by feminists, we are faced with the reality that a Women's Olympic final boxing match is going to be between two biological males. At least 2 of the 3 medals will go to males who have already crushed enough female boxers to "earn" them a spot. You might wonder why feminists organizations don't even want to stand up for women when it comes to these types of scenarios, but they don't.
Here is what NOW (National Organization for Women) thinks about transgendered competitors born as males, and who have gone through male puberty, competing against women. From The Spun (https://thespun.com/more/top-stories/national-organization-for-women-takes-side-in-transgender-athlete-debate)
NOW responded to the news that several former and current college athletes are suing the NCAA for violating their Title IX rights. This has to do with the NCAA's decision to let Lia Thomas compete in the 2022 national championships.
"Repeat after us: Weaponizing womenhood against other women is white supremacist patriarchy at work," the post from NOW said. "Making people believe there isn't enough space for trans women in sports is white supremacist patriarchy at work."
I'm not trying to disparage the ho-bags at NOW. I'm just stating pure fact.
So that spells it out, right? The National Organization for Women says that if you feel that it is wrong that two people born as males will be in the final women's boxing match at the Olympics, you are a member of the "white supremacist patriarchy". Not someone who understands the physical differences between men and women; not someone who loves your wife, your daughter, your sister, your mother, your aunt, your cousin, your best friend who has worked harder that anyone else in their sport to be at the top; not someone who grieves the devastation that we have seen so many women go through recently. Dreams get crushed in a devastating way, and apparently we just need to stand up and cheer for the two guys on the medal stand.
A lot of people are standing up to this, and fighting for women in this battle. One of them is Riley Gaines, the swimmer who was told she had to accept that a 6'4" male, with his male anatomy still attached, was an equal competitor, and there was no room for debate in giving him the gold medal. She has taken on the role of requiring this debate, to stand up for all women. I look up to her, and women are lucky to have her on our side. She is someone who respects and believes in women, and she will not back down when it comes to protecting them. The quote-unquote feminists disagree.
What needs to happen is that NOW should remove the word Women from their organization name, because Women are only used for the purpose of waving a political flag to get the credit from those who they are seeking to please (people devoted to Woke ideology) - there is no other way to see this. So, here is a much more accurate name for them - the National Organization for Wave the Flag - i.e. National Organization for WTF ... I think a lot of us agree.

Bài viết rất dễ hiểu, cảm ơn bạn đã chia sẻ. Mình cũng hay quan tâm chủ đề này, nhất là phần kiểm tra độ chịu nén vì trước giờ còn hơi mơ hồ. Do mình theo dõi thống kê XSMB mỗi ngày nên tự tổng hợp lại thành một trang riêng để tra nhanh và tiện đối chiếu. Ai cần xem số liệu cập nhật theo ngày thì ghé thử. Bạn nào cần thì tham khảo thêm ở https://tealfeed.com/soicauxsmbpro
Mình thỉnh thoảng cũng lướt mấy bài phân tích xổ số miền Bắc để đọc cho biết, coi như giải trí là chính, chứ không đặt niềm tin tuyệt đối. Hồi trước toàn nghe người quen rỉ tai kiểu “cầu này ngon” rồi ghi theo cho nhanh, nhưng trượt vài kỳ liên tiếp nên mình bắt đầu để ý hơn tới thống kê và cách họ diễn giải. Có lần đọc được một bài trên soicauxsmb.pro, mình mới thấy nhiều “cầu” thật ra chỉ là nhìn dữ liệu theo cảm giác, nên mình tự hạ kỳ vọng xuống. Từ đó mình xem mấy bài kiểu này như tham khảo vui thôi, nếu có chọn thì chọn ít, thử vận may…